It should be remembered that it is a struggle of the military-less
nations of Tamil Nadu Tamils and Eezham Tamils against imperialist New
Delhi and genocidal Colombo having ‘military to military’ relationship;
the former having an ‘Asian imperialist’ dream of foul geopolitical
foundations and means, and the latter considering the situation as a
once in a millennium historic opportunity to complete the genocide and
annihilation of the nation of Eezham Tamils in the island.
It
should also be remembered that in this process, the BJP and the Congress
are not different; JNU’s Romila Thaper and Harward’s Subramanian Swamy
are not different and Hindutva polity and Marxist Communism of India are
not different.
It is high time for Tamil Nadu to lead a
political process in India to form a third front, based on a
confederation of regional political parties and various people’s
movements all over India.
The BJP polity is going to evoke
dangerously sharp confrontations in India and disillusionment of masses
should not again bring in Sonia-Rahul-Priyanka Congress. Among the
southern States, it is only Karnataka that is lacking in coming out with
a powerful non-BJP/ non-Congress political formation. Others should
inspire and help Karnataka in this regard.
* * *
Encouraged
by New Delhi’s ‘geopolitics’ prostrating to genocide, Gotabaya
Rajapaksa’s defence ministry website came out with a derogatory feature
on Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Ms. Jayalalithaa, who was steadily voicing
against New Delhi’s foul complicity with genocidal Sri Lanka.
The
website withdrew the feature with unconditional apology and the
occasion has demonstrated a rare and appreciable coming together of all
political parties of Tamil Nadu in voicing protest.
Tamil Nadu is
always excellent in coming out with emotional responses. But when it
comes to theoretical challenges in shaping elite opinion in other parts
of India and in setting international perspectives, why should they
always be the realm of Cho Ramaswamies, Subramanian Swamies, Sri Lanka
Ratna Rams and now Seshadri Chari Ramanujams, is a question Tamil Nadu
intellectuals and political movements should peruse.
There is a
conscious and explicit effort by both New Delhi and Colombo to isolate
Tamil Nadu in India, just because it opposes a sinister imperialist
model creating another Israel in its neighbourhood.
The
Mumbai-based corporate media opinion mobilisations, genocidal Colombo’s
activities in Andhra and Odisha, and now Subramanian Swamy, BJP’s
Strategic Action Committee Chairman, saying, “let us delink Indo-Lanka
relations from Tamil Nadu and problems of the Tamils,” are some of the
manifestations of this isolation policy.
“Sri Lanka is the
guardian of the Indian Ocean for India. India’s security and prosperity
depends on security and prosperity in Sri Lanka,” said Seshadri Chari
Ramanujan, head of BJP’s Foreign Policy Cell, outlining BJP’s
envisagement for a ‘New Commonwealth of Asia.”
Tamil Nadu has
every theoretical and humanitarian justification in opposing the handing
over of the ‘guardianship’ of security to congenitally genocidal Sri
Lanka, and the foul foundations of the ‘New Commonwealth of Asia.’
* * *
But
geopolitics is partly a smokescreen. BJP’s corporate media journalist
Swapan Dasgupta, who was in the forefront in defending genocidal Sri
Lanka when he visited the island along with Sushma Swaraj, even before
BJP coming to power, said this time that Mr. Modi’s main priority is
unequivocally economic.
“It’s this very matter-of-fact, urgent
business style – very Gujerati. That’s the DNA that will define Modi.”
Colombo’s Sunday Times cited Swapan Dasgupta.
Eezham Tamils in
their long struggle in the island know well what genre of theoretical
DNAs contributed to their genocide and are continuing with that.
When
PTI cited Seshadri Chari Ramanujan that he had told Colombo to resolve
the Tamil issue for trade and commerce between Colombo and New Delhi to
progress, Chari came out with an immediate denial, saying that he had
never spoken those words in Colombo.
According to him, he had
only expressed his opinion that the Tamils issue was an internal matter
of Sri Lanka and should not be internationalised.
"I am a votary of greater trade and commerce with Sri Lanka," he added.
* * *
Full
complicity in genocide and continued genocide is not involvement in
internal matters. Ganging up with the USA and 30+ world Establishments
in the genocide was not internationalisation. But investigation, justice
and talking of any just solution are interference and
internationalisation – this is BJP New Delhi’s ‘national interest’
transcending ‘regional interest’.
“We are very proud of your
president for decisively finishing a sinister terror organisation that
was a threat to our country too,” Subramanian Swamy said in Colombo
amidst applause, adding, “Let no activity in the international arena
subtract from them…sometimes I wonder is these HR issues contrived to
belittle the importance of this decisive victory.”
According to
Swamy, countries accusing Sri Lanka of rights abuse were themselves
guilty of serious violations and hence, “There is no need for Sri Lanka,
or India, to be defensive about it.”
According to BJP’s South
India based ‘geopolitics’ pundit, Prof Madhavan Nalapat, who was
speaking on BRICS as a ‘viable new architecture’ to balance the monopoly
of NATO, Rajapaksa is a hero.
“In this multi-polar world Sri
Lanka has an important role” he asserted. In 2009 Mahinda Rajapaksa did
not give in to pressures to ‘give certain individuals one more chance.’
There is a clear message in that kind of independence coming at a time
when the unipolar world is on the wane. “Sri Lanka’s independent foreign
policy is appreciated by Modi,” Sunday Times cited Madhavan Nalapat.
If Madhavan’s reference is to the USA, Tamils have every reason to consider New Delhi as a worse adversary than Washington.
If
genocidal Mahinda Rajapaksa’s ‘independence’ in not giving in to
pressure, (opportunistically) seeing the unipolar world on the wane, is
appreciable to Modi, what greater applause and appreciation
Pirapaharan’s LTTE that didn't surrender a righteous liberation struggle
should get from the world humanity, for not giving in to the joint
mobilisation of the USA, UK, India, China, Russia, Japan, EU, and 30+
Establishments and the UN, the trade union of these Establishments?
* * *
The
PPT has a lacuna in not pursuing the investigation and exposure on the
role of India in the genocide and continued genocide of Eezham Tamils.
Tamils
have not done enough studies on the competition between Washington and
New Delhi over the island ever since the Bandung Conference and Nehru’s
times, and how it was the Tamils who were always at the receiving end,
first the up-country Tamils of Indian origin and then the Eezham Tamils,
as scapegoats of New Delhi’s same old ‘geopolitics’ taking only new
‘avatars’.
Genocidal Sri Lanka’s former permanent representative
to the UN in Geneva during the war, Dayan Jayatilleka, said on Friday
that, “India under Modi will not take kindly to the West bypassing India
and attempting to strong arm Sri Lanka.”
Will Tamil Nadu of 70
million people, and having an equal say in the geopolitical location,
take it kindly to New Delhi bypassing it in making an unholy alliance
with Sri Lanka in the annihilation of the nation of Eezham Tamils,
creating permanent unrest in Tamil Nadu, is the question. History will
answer it.
Related Articles:29.07.14
Vaiko condemns BJP’s ‘poisonous’ nexus with genocidal Sri La..12.07.14
BJP regime provides ‘benami’ economic benefits to genocidal ..06.06.14
SL Army conducts ‘archaeology’, The Hindu relays ‘history’19.05.14
India gets prime minister of his own political stature13.01.14
Tamil Nadu needs to initiate Vietnam-like international stru..18.06.13
BJP, RSS, Shiv Sena answerable to Dasgupta policy-line20.03.13
Indian intelligentsia led by The Hindu, CPI-M, failed Tamils..04.09.12
‘BJP legitimizes Sri Lanka’s culture of genocide through Bud..11.04.12
The Hindu envisages India building business over Tamil genoc..24.01.12
Kalam risks his image in salvaging New Delhi in Tamil Nadu03.08.10
New Delhi academic comments in Colombo on diaspora transnati..16.11.07
Eelam and Indian Security: Need for policy alternatives16.11.07
Eelam and Indian Security: Averting a CatastropheExternal Links: