ICE orchestrates once again to deviate from crux of the matter
[TamilNet, Wednesday, 31 October 2012, 10:29 GMT]
Following deliberations by Norway’s Erik Solheim, ICG’s Alan Keenan
and the UNSG panel member Yasmin Sooka at Frances Harrison’s book launch
in London earlier this month, the Emeritus President of the ICG and
former foreign minister of Australia, Gareth Evans on Friday was harping
on war crimes of both sides, accountability of the remaining side and
post-mortem on the UN, but omitting the ultimate culprits and deviating
from the crux of the matter– the genocide and the national question in
the island. He is now advisor to International Crimes Evidence Project, a
recently established outfit in Australia. While Dr. Radha D’Souza
exposes the deviatory tactics of such orchestrations, Tamils have to
think of alternative international mobilisation of opinion.
The ICG President Emeritus, writing on Friday on “Remembering Sri
Lanka’s Killing Fields,” was aiming for a showdown at Geneva in March
2013, which seems to be the agenda of the newly formed International
Crimes Evidence Project.
The agenda, coming from the premises of
‘war crimes of both sides’ and expecting the remaining side to accept
its share of responsibility, will seal off the matter with it.
The
independence aspiration of genocide-affected Eezham Tamils will then be
‘part of the war crimes’ and that will be stigmatised and shelved.
The other part of the agenda is to scapegoat the UN, ostensibly to absolve the ultimate culprits from the crimes.
This
is an internationally orchestrated project on the island and one may
find almost the same people, same Establishments and same ‘development’
agencies involved in the outfits such as the ICG, International Alert
and various other foundations and institutions that handle the
orchestration.
Gareth Evans was upholding three publications for
his crime-pursuing mission: The UN panel report, “The Cage” written by
Gordon Weiss, the former UN spokesperson in Colombo during the war, and
“Still Counting the Death,” by former BBC journalist Frances Harrison.
None of them accept or bring out the genocidal nature of the war.
Evans ignored the Dublin Report, Norway’s report that found fault with the ‘peace facilitators’ and Malathy’s recent book.
The ICG had a campaign responsibility in facilitating the genocidal war in the island.
Gordon
Weiss, whose book was launched by Gareth Evans, is answerable for the
way he carried out his duties as UN spokesperson during the war.
Frances
Harrison, in the introduction of her book, was just parroting what Erik
Solheim has been telling. The most controversial of them is her
assertion that “At the height of the mayhem, the rebels turned down an
internationally mediated surrender plan brokered by Norway that would
have stopped the killings. It could have saved thousands of life.”
Solheim
was telling earlier that there was a solution on the table that was
turned down by the LTTE. Now he says this. If there was any genuine plan
why has that not been told to hundreds of thousands of Eezham Tamils
who took to streets at the height of the war is the question of ordinary
people.
It should definitely be a matter of welcome for Eezham
Tamils if there is going to be any genuine international effort,
beginning with pursuing war crimes accountability. But past experiences
have shown us that both the ICE and India in their own ways are more
concerned about buying time for them and giving time to the genocidal
state in the island than delivering justice.
There could be no
justice to Eezham Tamils unless the matter is addressed as a national
question and annihilation of a nation, resulting from a prolonged and
on-going genocide.
* * *
On the question
of genocide, for those who argue that it is a lengthy legal process to
establish, Dr. Radha D’Souza has come out with an apt answer, while
commenting on the speeches at Frances Harrison’s book launch event.
“It
was ingenious in what they were trying to say because the genocide
dimension in international law is quite explicit in the definition of
what is the meaning of genocide. It says, if any state makes a
deliberate, knowing […] steps to exterminate, or to oppress, or to deny
any group of people their language, their culture, their history, their
existence then it amounts to genocide. […] The genocide convention is
very very clear on this, there is no ambiguity, and what they tried to
say was “oh we are not lawyers and we can’t really talk about genocide.”
Dr. D’Souza said.
“This was the position of the United Nations
representative. If the United Nations representative on human rights
does not know the meaning of genocide what can people expect from them?”
“Now Solheim’s position was again very ingenious, he was
saying, let us forget the genocide issue. But the real reason why the
Tamils want the genocide issue is because they want to connect it to
Eelam. Well, they were trying to directly connect it to Eelam. But he
had no answer, other than making it as a political rouse of the Tamils.”
“He could not answer the question: was it genocide, was it not
genocide? None of the three panellists answered that. It was a very
straightforward question.[…]The UN person very clearly said no, it’s not
genocide. So one wonders what is genocide, if this is not
genocide…under the definition. The others dodged the issue completely.
They did not answer, yes or no. It was a very simple question,” Dr.
D’Souza commented.
* * *
ICG’s Alan Keenan sounded like that it is the task of somebody else to prove the genocide and the on-going genocide.
Those
among the Eezham Tamils who want to provide logistical, factual,
institutional and other kinds of support to the war crimes
accountability model may do so, but it is not going to bring them the
justice they envisage.
Eezham Tamils should have their own
agenda, coupled with noble norms of humanity. For this purpose they
should mobilise their own support group of international civil society
rather than getting hooked with outfits working for the agenda of the
very Establishments that deny them justice.
The following verse of Thirumoolar of 5th century CE is for the benefit of Tamil readers:
குருட்டினை நீக்கும் குருவினைக் கொள்ளார்
குருட்டினை நீக்காக் குருவினைக் கொள்வர்
குருடும் குருடும் குருட்டாட்டம் ஆடிக்
குருடும் குருடும் குழிவிழுமாறே.
Kuruddinai neekkum kuruvinaik ko'l'laar
kuruddinai neekkaak kuruvinaik ko'lvar
kurudum kurudum kuruddaddam aadik
kurudum kurudum kuzhivizhumaa'rea
Making it worse, the guides are not blind preceptors, but who pretend to be blind.
Related Articles:14.10.12
Global trends and Tamil politics 10.10.12
Frances Harrison in Palaka'ni 09.10.12
Genocide needs investigation but separation contextually unw.. 08.10.12
Academics question ICE deceit after Solheim's speech at Lond.. 06.10.12
Solheim’s politics, UN role in SL criticized at Frances Harr.. 20.08.12
Malathy’s ‘Fleeting Moment’ a testimonial to earned sovereig.. 11.02.12
War crimes of ‘both sides’ or war crimes of all sides: Oslo .. 23.11.11
‘Sandwich theory’ an excuse for not taking a stand: Indian a.. 17.09.11
Weiss's "The Cage" adds to Colombo's war-crime woes 15.06.11
Gordon Weiss tries to unrelate fire and smoke: Jaffna politi.. 26.01.09
'Biased UN official misleads humanity, safely sitting in Col..
External Links:
