US லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி
US லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி

திங்கள், 16 டிசம்பர், 2013

US Congressional caucus to draw attention to Tamil plight

US Congressional caucus to draw attention to Tamil plight

[TamilNet, Saturday, 14 December 2013, 23:48 GMT]
The Congressional Caucus on Ethnic and Religious Freedom in Sri Lanka, initiated by Congressmen Bill Johnson (R-OH) and Danny Davis (D-IL) aims to bring the attention of the American public to the Tamils in Sri Lanka and their plight, Washington Times reported in its Thursday edition. In a joint press release, Congressmen Johnson and Davis said, “Given the magnitude of horrors Sri Lankans bore witness to, and how the most egregious alleged violators of international law remain unpunished, accountability for the guilty is essential for helping those who have suffered to heal, and the country’s diverse population reconcile.”

The paper noted that in 2011, the US and UN officials refused to meet delegates from northern Sri Lanka, and said that the turnaround is a welcome surprise, and hoped that the change in stand is a humanitarian rather than a business.
Congressman Danny Davis, Democrat from Illinois
Congressman Danny Davis, Democrat from Illinois
Congressman Bill Johnson, Republican from OHIO
Congressman Bill Johnson, Republican from OHIO
While also noting that Tamils desire for their own homeland, as evidenced by the election results in September where the Tamil National Alliance won 30 out of 38 seats in the North of Sri Lanka, has not diminshed, the paper said that if in 1948, Sri Lanka adopted the principles of equality before the law, there probably would have been no ethnic tensions to this degree in Sri Lanka. "What would the Tamil have to complain about if equality before the law was guaranteed by the constitution?' the paper asked.

Since 1948, the Sri Lankan government had implemented a strategy of disenfranchising Tamils, the article said, adding, this strategy included restricing Tamil access to higher education, business licenses, and settling non Tamils on Tamil land. Although the Tamils cried foul, the world ignored them. Until now, the paper observed.

Today a third of Tamils reside outside Sri Lanka, mostly in Western Europe and North America, but there are many residing in Africa and Asia

On the oligarchy evolving in Sri Lanka, which UN's High Commissioner for Refugees, Navi Pillay, recognized as moving towards authoritarianism, the paper observed that "[t]he Presidents family controls the economy and government of Sri Lanka. President Rajapaksa belongs to a family that controls huge chunks of the Sri Lankan economy, with obvious signs of government favoritism over the years, lucrative contracts and licenses, a clear sign of inequality in the laws.

"Such principles should be wiped out of the minds of Tamils, all Tamils must be treated equally by the law, the Washington Times concluded.

External Links:
WT: Tamil Tragedy: A Case for equality before the law

ஞாயிறு, 11 ஆகஸ்ட், 2013

US condemns violence in Welweriya

US condemns violence in Welweriya

[TamilNet, Saturday, 10 August 2013, 23:08 GMT]
“The United States has expressed concern over the fatal shooting of three civilians by the Sri Lankan military, which attacked people seeking protection in a church during a recent protest to demand clean drinking water,” Associated Press reported on Saturday, citing from a State Department spokeswoman, Jen Psaki, who said that “there was no excuse for violence, especially in a house of worship.” Ms. Psaki has also called for “a thorough and transparent inquiry” into the violence at Welweriya. While taking into consideration the US consternation over the Sri Lankan military’s brutality, activists in the island urge that if America is genuinely concerned about the highhanded behaviour of the Sri Lankan military, then Pentagon should suspend all military-to-military relationship with a state accused of genocide.

“We call for a thorough and transparent inquiry into all aspects of the Weliweriya violence, for those conclusions to be made public and for there to be a credible mechanism to prosecute any wrongdoing,” the Associated Press quoted Ms. Psaki.

Separately, in a release on Friday, Human Rights Watch called on the Sri Lankan government to investigate the deaths that occurred owing to the violence at Welweriya.

“It’s undisputed that security forces killed three protesters, but the Sri Lankan government’s kneejerk reaction is to deny possible wrongdoing,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director of HRW.

“Instead of promoting the military’s version of events, the government should order an independent investigation and prosecute anyone who violated the law,” she added.

புதன், 7 ஆகஸ்ட், 2013

US-Sri Lanka collaboration conducts ‘Exercise Pacific Angel’ in occupied Jaffna

US-Sri Lanka collaboration conducts ‘Exercise Pacific Angel’ in occupied Jaffna

[TamilNet, Tuesday, 06 August 2013, 18:16 GMT]
A joint ‘disaster response’ training operation by the US Pacific Air Force and the genocide-accused Sri Lanka Air Force is being conducted in occupied Jaffna. Named ‘Exercise Pacific Angel’, the collaborative activity began on 5th August and is scheduled to end on the 10th. Sri Lanka’s Defence.lk reports that the exercise will comprise of two components, namely a medical program and a renovation program. The irony of the name of the exercise and of the training of Sri Lanka Air Force, which caused genocidal disaster during the war on the Eezham Tamil nation, in ‘disaster response’ is not lost on Tamil activists, sources in Jaffna commented.

Irony apart, the insidious intentions of the US establishment as regards the island are becoming clearer with the increase of such military-to-military ‘engagements’.

Certain sections of Tamil activists get deluded with the slightest patronage from the US State Department or with a report that talks about ‘human rights violations’ in abstract. But unless the Pentagon’s policy is addressed, it is hard to expect anything positive from the US establishment, the sources added.

“The medical program is mainly focused in providing Primary Health Care, Physical Therapy, Optometry and Dentistry for the civil personnel and to conduct the Subject Matter Medical Exchange Program (SMEE) of Aero Medical Evacuation at SLAF Base Kat. Activities will take place in Alvain [Alvaay] North village, Atchelu [Achchezhu] Village, and SLAF Base Katunayaka,” occupying Sri Lanka's Defence.lk reported on Monday.

“The renovation program mainly focuses on renovating of school buildings and uplifting the infrastructure facilities of those schools. Sri Lankan and U.S. engineers will renovate the Punnalaikkadduvan [Punnaalaik-kadduvan] Primary School, the Kuddiyapulam [Kuddiyap-pulam] Mixed School, and the Atchelu [Achchezhu] Saivapragasa Vidyalayam,” the report added.

Chronology:

செவ்வாய், 6 ஆகஸ்ட், 2013

US impressed by India’s ‘successful’ COIN operations

US impressed by India’s ‘successful’ COIN operations, seeks joint training

[TamilNet, Monday, 05 August 2013, 16:24 GMT]
“Impressed by the Indian Army's successful counter-terrorism operations, the US Army chief has proposed joint training between the armies of the two countries,” PTI reported on Sunday. The US Army Chief of Staff General Ray Odierno, observing the need for greater cooperation between the militaries of the two countries, has called for “joint training to benefit from India's experiences in counter-insurgency in a tough environment and difficult terrain.” In an interview to PTI, Gen. Odierno expressed interest in learning from India in conducting military operations in difficult terrain.

"We would love to do some joint training in the mountainous environment, because what the Indian Army has learned over the years, we would love to share what we learned about counter-insurgency and compare experiences and see how we can learn from each other and how we can direct that to use in the future, so for me it is something that is important," Odierno had told PTI.

"Everybody recognises, India has so much in common with the US and that it is important for us to sustain a strong long-lasting relationship," he had further said.

When asked about his interest in having joint military exercises in the Jammu and Kashmir region, one of India’s persisting conflict regions which is also a geographically hard terrain, the US General had said that “this is something that the US may be interested in but still need to take a look at by sending people to train in these types of environments.”

Several Tamil activists and analysts condemn the Washington-New Delhi nexus as being the chief architects of Sri Lanka’s genocidal war on the Eezham Tamil nation.

ஞாயிறு, 4 ஆகஸ்ட், 2013

US to increase military ties with Burma

US to increase military ties with Burma despite escalating Buddhist extremism

[TamilNet, Saturday, 03 August 2013, 16:20 GMT]
“The United States will boost military ties with Burma later this month to encourage greater professionalism and more civilian oversight over the Southeast Asian country’s armed forces,” news portal The Irrawaddy said on Friday, citing the Myanmar Times. This engagement happens despite a steadily growing Buddhist extremism in the country and the state-supported persecution of ethnic Kachins and the Rohingya Muslims. US ambassador Derek Mitchell has said that through the military engagement, the US was not planning to sell arms but only to focus on humanitarian issues. US officials have also called for amendments to the military-written constitution of Burma, Irrawaddy reported. Critics however look at these steps as a ‘carrot and stick’ approach to bring Burma into the US ambit, while ignoring the structural problems in the country.

Earlier in July, in an article on the Huffington Post, Kachin writed Nang Seng, appealing to the US to not forget their Kachin “allies”, lamented “The Kachin people of Burma have watched in disbelief as at the same time as their villages are burned, their wives raped and their husbands shot while farming in the fields, the international community, including the USA, has hailed Thein Sein as a courageous reformer.”

Despite the much talked about ‘pro-reform’ policies of President Thein Sein, a former military commander, Buddhist extremism has been steadily on the rise in the country. Observers claim that such extremists are given state patronage.

Time Magazine’s July 1st edition had run a detailed cover story on the “Buddhist terror” unleashed by the 969 Movement led by the monk A. Wirathu against Muslims in Burma.

Hundreds of Rohingya Muslims were killed by Burmese state-sanctioned Buddhist violence last year in the Rakhine region.

In February 2013 UN Special Rapporteur to Burma Mr. Tomas Ojea Quintana had criticized in the large military presence in Kachin areas and had also expressed concern over the plight of the Rohingya displaced persons.

சனி, 27 ஜூலை, 2013

‘US-British imperialism helps Sinhala colonization

‘US-British imperialism helps Sinhala colonization of Tamil homeland’

[TamilNet, Friday, 26 July 2013, 21:32 GMT]
The help of US and British imperialism assists the Sinhala state’s colonization of Tamil areas, observes a solidarity statement by Europe based Kurdish and Turkish diaspora youth organizations. Released on the occasion of Black July, the statement in German language, signed by 4 Left-leaning youth organizations and published on the official website of the German based Kurdish youth organization the Union of Students from Kurdistan (YXK), besides condemning the massacre in July 1983 also traced the continuity of genocide to May 2009 and after, stating that the rulers “had no interest in the scheduled peace process and negotiations”.

The statement was signed by Union of Students from Kurdistan (YXK), Democratic Youth Movement Europe (ADGH), Young Struggle (YS) and Union of Students from Kurdistan (YXK).

“On 30 Anniversary of the massacre of the Tamils, we remember all the victims of Black July. Organized youth from Turkey and Kurdistan who have come together to stand up together against all forms of oppression, exploitation and repression, we will continue to go in this sense to the streets and stand up for freedom and justice. As youth organizations in Europe, we have joined us to focus our efforts in the future, together, in solidarity and determination to build international solidarity and to take our organization to the streets,” the statement said.

Welcoming this gesture of solidarity, Balakrishnan Koculan, representative of the youth wing of the German Die Linke party, told TamilNet “From 1983 to 2009 and to now, world establishments assisted and abetted the genocidal war on the Eezham Tamil nation. Our real friends in the international community are oppressed nations and progressive forces who have been persecuted by the same establishments. Only when the Tamil youth join hands with such forces and conduct a resolute struggle, will our calls for justice be heeded.”

External Links:
YXK: Wir werden das Massaker an die TamilInnen nicht vergessen

வியாழன், 25 ஜூலை, 2013

Albright-Williamson report paves way for further injustice to Eezham Tamils

Albright-Williamson report paves way for further injustice to Eezham Tamils

[TamilNet, Wednesday, 24 July 2013, 15:44 GMT]
The “United States and R2P” report authored by Madeleine K. Albright, former US Secretary of State, and Richard S. Williamson, former US presidential special envoy to Sudan, paves way for further injustice to the genocide-affected nation of Eezham Tamils, by harping on “national reconciliation” of the genocidal State of Sri Lanka and by harping on helping the genocidal government to respond to the needs of “all communities” in the so-called country, commented Tamil activists for alternative politics in the island. The deliberate flaw in the report stems from the stand of not recognising the genocide in the war and the genocidal intent of the Sinhala State decades before the war and the years following the war, the activists said.

Further comments from the Tamil activists for alternative politics in the island:
The report is only partly truthful when it says that the International Community has “neglected its responsibility to take timely action when it was apparent that violations of humanitarian law were taking place”, during the Vanni War.

But this is only a pointless post-mortem, when the report fails in recognizing the genocide, and comes out with recommendations contrary to any future timely action righteous to the context, even when it is apparent that there is an accelerated postwar structural genocide following the genocidal war.

No report makers with a background of the Establishments in the West have ever been orientated to investigate the genocidal angle of the decades-old conflict in the island.

The report just saying, “For over twenty-five years, the conflict in Sri Lanka pitted the army against the separatist insurgency of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE),” is not doing justice to the study of the conflict.

Such report makers coming from the very Establishments of the so-called International Community that not unknowingly ‘neglected’ its responsibilities, continue not unknowingly neglecting responsibilities in setting the future agenda, so that the original aim of the ‘negligence’ will be fulfilled.

It was such report makers who led to the international-abetted Mu’l’livaaykkaal genocide. The present report makers are no different in leading to the completion of the genocide structurally, when they talk of ‘national reconciliation’ and needs of ‘all communities’ in an apparent and chronic genocidal context, that too when one nation is militarized to the teeth and the other has been made totally unarmed.

While the writers of the Indian Establishment detract due justice in crude ways by talking of the need to appease with the opposition of the Sinhalese to federalism, and adding to that, the need to extract “iron-clad” guarantees against any future Tamil demand for separation, the writers of the US Establishment come out with worse in sophisticated ways.

Perhaps it is the sophistication that makes many a gullible in the diaspora to think that Washington is better than New Delhi. Several outfits have been engineered in the West to keep the diaspora under that illusion and to prevent any challenging uprising.

While an opinion gang-up is thus being polarised by the Establishment writers, the diaspora is not merely silent but some among it even imply appreciation by highlighting substance-less admissions and deceptions as positive developments.

The activists in the diaspora fail in countering the ‘opinion-genocide’, especially when it comes from the USA, as they failed in confronting the LLRC-based, US-tabled, Geneva resolution.

In the given context of twist of justice by the powers, the military-less global Tamils should never forget that unless mass action, especially with the help of Tamil Nadu, brings in geopolitical compulsions, nothing could be achieved democratically, if the Tamils care for a democratic struggle.

Chronology:

வியாழன், 18 ஜூலை, 2013

Political solution comes only when military-geostrategy approach overpowered

Political solution comes only when military-geostrategy approach overpowered

[TamilNet, Thursday, 18 July 2013, 02:51 GMT]
The recent joint US-Sri Lankan military exercise in Trincomalee, coming after Colombo announcing the ‘arrest’ of a few police personnel for the massacre of five Tamil students in Trincomalee, signals that the USA is again sending a message to China that it still considers the island in the Indian Ocean Region as a US-Indian territory, says a geopolitical analyst in Trincomalee. The development also signals to Tamils that powers locked in the geopolitical game are only seeking eyewash and token responses from the Sri Lankan State. Political solution will never come unless masses overpower the rotten military-geostrategy approach of the powers, forcing them to seek alternatives, the analyst said.

Back in 2006, before the genocidal onslaught on Vanni, the USA conducted an ‘unprecedented exercise’ in Hambantota sending the same messages to China and to the Tamils, as a report authored by the US-based global intelligence company Stratfor at that time had claimed, the analyst further writes reproducing the report by the US-based intelligence company that had claimed in 2006 that the USA was contributing to Rajapaksa regime’s war against the Tamil Tigers.

“The United States has a large interest in Sri Lanka. On a strategic level, the island sits on some of the most important shipping lanes in the world near many geopolitical hotspots, and has one of the finest ports in the world, Trincomalee,” was the wordings of the 2006 analyses by the Stratfor.

One should take note that a CSIS report, issued six years later in 2012, was of the view Sri Lanka was the most pro-U.S. country in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) till 2008.

“Sri Lanka has traditionally practiced a non-alignment policy but before 2008 was arguably the most pro-U.S. country in the region, signing up to a range of U.S.-led initiatives such as the Proliferation Security Initiative, the Container Security Initiative, acquisition and cross-servicing agreements, and intelligence-sharing. As the Sri Lankan civil war intensified and neared its conclusion, relations with the United States and the West grew more strained, and China began filling the void with significant weapons exports and economic assistance.” (U.S. Force Posture Strategy in the Asia Pacific Region: An Independent Assessment, August 2012, p. 39).

Obviously, this indicates the U.S. need for either enforcing Rajapaksa regime to fall in line with the de-facto position or replacing the regime with another one that would re-instate the de-facto alliance as it was before 2008.

Whatever the ways, ‘Sri Lanka’ is needed, as an ally to the United States is the underlying position.

This is why the USA has taken the affair of tabling resolutions in UN Human Rights Council, seeking to steer the process by limiting the ‘play rules’ to be Rajapaksa’s own LLRC and India imposed Provincial Councils.

It is in this light the Tamils should see why the USA and its outfits are hoodwinking the Tamils not to alter the play rules through a mass struggle in the region as well as in the West.

Such outfits manipulate Pro-Eelam diaspora groups and personalities among Eezham Tamils to carryout a blatant ‘pro USA’ campaign.

A similar campaign is also being taken forward through Colombo-Mannaar-Jaffna axis in the island.

In Tamil Nadu, maneuverings by these forces were successfully challenged by the awaken students during the mass agitation.

The pro-US outfits are particular in making Tamils not to view the resolutions tabled by the USA as undermining the Tamil interest, especially the intentional failure in not welcoming or calling for an international investigation on Sri Lanka. The US resolution only took ‘note’ of the demand for international investigation as a measure of veiled threat against the Rajapaksa regime.

In fact, what the USA seeks from the Rajapaksa regime is to come up with eyewash measures like the recent arrest of a few SL police personnel on the killing of five Tamil students in Trincomalee in relieving the Sri Lankan regime from the global responsibility in delivering justice.

Whether the Rajapaksa regime would ‘mend its ways‘ to the U.S. designs in reverting back to the regime’s de-facto U.S. alliance during 2005 to 2008 or not, what Eezham Tamils should take note of is to take forward the political struggle with the focus of causing an attitudinal change in the powers that continue to abet the genocidal State of Sri Lanka.

The ‘Stratfor report’ from October 20, 2006 is reproduced in full below:

Sri Lanka: Exercises with U.S. Send a Message to China

October 20, 2006 | 0241 GMT

Summary

The U.S. Marine Corps will participate in unprecedented exercises with the Sri Lankan navy at the end of October, deploying more than 1,000 Marines and large support ships to drill with the Sri Lankan armed forces on amphibious and counterinsurgency operations. Coincidentally, the exercise is occurring on beaches in Hambantota -- precisely where the Chinese are planning to build oil and bunker facilities.

Analysis

Elements of the U.S. 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) embarked the ships of the USS Boxer Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG) to travel to Sri Lanka for large-scale amphibious exercises with the Sri Lankan armed forces, slated for the last week of October. The MEU is equipped with a robust amphibious assault capability, including armored amphibious assault vehicles and landing craft. The ESG's smaller amphibious ships -- the USS Dubuque and USS Comstock -- and their embarked Marines will reportedly play a prominent role in the maneuvers.

The exercises will no doubt threaten the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, which is part of the U.S. reasoning behind the exercises. However, the site of the maneuvers -- off the southern beaches of Hambantoa, where China is planning to build modern harbor facilities -- shows that India likely signed off on this venture as a way to signal to China that the Indian Ocean is U.S.-Indian territory.

The United States has a large interest in Sri Lanka. On a strategic level, the island sits on some of the most important shipping lanes in the world near many geopolitical hotspots, and has one of the finest ports in the world, Trincomalee. On a tactical level, training the Sri Lankan armed forces in amphibious maneuvers will allow the United States to test its counterinsurgency tactics by proxy against the Tigers, who will surely bear the brunt of any new Sri Lankan military capability. The Tigers are the only militants who boast an operational naval wing: the Sea Tigers. The Sea Tigers possess a wide range of capabilities, including custom-built fast suicide bomb boats, and were behind the Oct. 18 suicide attack on Sri Lanka's southern Galle port. U.S. training and joint exercises will allow the Sri Lankan armed forces to test out Washington's newest theories on littoral battle without putting any U.S. soldiers at risk.

The United States also hopes increased pressure on the Tigers will force the group to seriously enter peace talks. Furthermore, any degradation in the Tigers' ability to smuggle arms will take a large link out of the black market weapons chain that stretches from Bangladesh to Indonesia.

Whatever Washington's reasons for the exercises, the maneuvers could not happen without India's permission. Though New Delhi is not nearly the geopolitical powerhouse that Washington is, the United States has anointed India as its junior partner in the Indian Ocean. The United States -- and other members of the Sri Lankan Donors Group, which assists with post-tsunami rebuilding and brokers peace talks -- traditionally consults with India on all decisions related to Colombo.

It is precisely this interest in regional pre-eminence that led India to give the go-ahead for U.S. forces to participate in a major training exercise geared toward fighting the Tamil insurgency. After all, India cannot risk offending its own sizable Tamil minority if there is not a substantial reward involved. In this case, the reward is the chance to send a targeted message to one particular country with the U.S.-Sri Lankan exercises: China.

The much-ballyhooed Indo-Chinese rivalry is not nearly as heated as many believe. Significant geographical factors -- such as the Himalayan Mountains and thousands of miles of jungle -- prevent India and China from having any real disputes. However, the countries share a common naval frontier near the Strait of Malacca and Singapore. The United States, with Indian assistance, intends to maintain the Indian Ocean as its own strategic waterway. China's intrusion into the area by building ports at Gwadar in Pakistan, in Myanmar and now possibly in Bangladesh irks New Delhi. Thus, it is no coincidence that the exact area of the U.S.-Sri Lankan exercises is Hambantota, the very harbor that China announced it would begin developing for Colombo in 2005.

There are also indications that the relationship between India and China is becoming increasingly frayed. China was likely the major stumbling block to India's Shashi Tharoor becoming U.N. secretary-general, and India has been blocking Chinese investments in infrastructure due to security concerns. India, already deeply rooted in its protectionist traditions, has focused its rising economic nationalist agenda primarily on Chinese assets. For example, Hong Kong-based Hutchison Ports Holdings has faced delays in obtaining security clearances from New Delhi, and, as a result, has been unable to commence operations on port projects at Mumbai and Chennai.

Chinese President Hu Jintao's upcoming visit, during India's National Day, will give both sides a chance to mend some fences, but the U.S. Marine Corps exercises reveal a deeper geopolitical reality: The United States and India will not tolerate Chinese expansion, especially into the Indian Ocean.

Chronology:

செவ்வாய், 9 ஜூலை, 2013

TNA fails on several counts: S.K. Sitrampalam

TNA fails on several counts: S.K. Sitrampalam

[TamilNet, Monday, 08 July 2013, 07:20 GMT]
In the opinion of political analysts, the polity of Tamil National Alliance (TNA) is nothing but playing a stooge to the USA and India – time after time and without any returns – said Dr. S.K. Sitrampalam, Emeritus Professor of Jaffna University and a senior ITAK leader, while addressing the Jaffna Press Club on Saturday. TNA has failed in mobilising a people’s struggle, failed in politicising people on the question of rights, failed in placing a full-fledged federal solution draft as an alternative to separate Tamil Eelam, failed in forging alliance with Muslims and Up-country Tamils, failed in addressing Sinhala people on the justice behind the Tamil struggle, failed in effectively using the post-war international situation and failed in transparency within the alliance itself, Sitrampalam said.
S. K. Sitrampalam
Prof Sitrampalam in his press address particularly criticized the TNA harping on the electoral politics based on the 13th Amendment and claiming that it is a ‘first step’.

The 13th Amendment was enacted with a judicial confirmation that it was not breaching the unitary character of State in the island. The provinces are just an extension of the presidential rule. It is unhealthy and there is no use in it. When the district councils were introduced [in the early 80s] then also the TULF alliance, including the ITAK, went into it saying that it was a first step. But it brought nothing, Sitrampalam who was then a supporter of the move conceded.

[The failed District Development Councils were introduced in 1981 under J.R. Jeyawardane regime, presumably advised by Prof A J Wilson and tacitly supported by the US Establishment. The 13th Amendment bringing in Provincial Councils was a result of the Indo-Lanka Agreement of 1987.]

The five parties in the TNA should have denounced the 13th Amendment and should have openly insisted on a full-fledged federal as an alternative to separate Tamil Eelam. But, even four years after a mass field sacrifice, the TNA has failed in categorically saying what we want and what is the draft for it, Sitrampalam said.

He was hinting at the ‘non-descript’ solution approach some TNA parliamentarians were parading after receiving instructions from the LLRC-harping USA, observers at the press meet commented.

* * *

On the TNA’s failure in leading a people’s struggle, Sitrampalam compared the 1961 non-violent mass struggle and said that now no people respond to any calls by political parties.

To lead a people’s struggle, the TNA parliamentarians should be first prepared to live in the land of struggle with their families, Sitrampalam said.

Thanthai Selva once said that a time would come for the world to know and respond to the struggle of Tamils – just like the World War II paving way for the independence of India – Sitrampalam, former senior professor of history and archaeology, cited.

When such an opportunity came, and while the matter has now been taken at the level of the UN, the TNA fails in cutting an appropriate profile and internationally spearheading the struggle in an effective way. Many of them lack political vision and clarity, Sitrampalam said.

* * *

In the press club address, Sitrampalam was also targeting the transparency-inner democracy situation in the TNA, particularly in the ITAK, in which he is a Vice-President of the Central Committee.

On the Coordination Committee formed recently within the TNA to keep the alliance together, Sitrampalam said that it was motivated only by an unimportant issue such as the question of contesting elections for the 13A-based provincial council.

The decision of forming the committee with 3 members each from the 5 constituent parties was taken without the knowledge of the ITAK Central Committee, Sitrampalam said.

In the past history of the ITAK, it was the Central Committee that used to take decisions on such matters. But, in recent times there is a style of functioning in which the parliamentary group is taking decisions. This is a blunder, he said.

* * *

In the given context of geopolitics and military-grooming approach of all the powers involved, the people’s struggle Prof Sitrampalam was referring to needs to be addressed at an international level, primarily against Washington and New Delhi, by the mobilisation of all the global Tamils. But at every sector, whether the diaspora, Tamil Nadu or the island, the leadership is systematically gagged, bound, manipulated, or diffused through grooming mediocrity by the age-old culprits implied by Prof Sitrampalam. The TNA is just a part of the picture. The breakthrough has to be achieved at some point, commented Tamils for alternative politics in the island.

வெள்ளி, 5 ஜூலை, 2013

Philippines to allow US, Japan strategic access to military bases

Philippines to allow US, Japan strategic access to military bases

[TamilNet, Thursday, 04 July 2013, 23:28 GMT]
Philippines president Beningno Aquino, in a statement on Tuesday, said that his government would allow America and Japan, long time “strategic partners” of successive regimes, exclusive access to former US military bases in the country. This development has provoked reactions from the Chinese, who are currently locked in a maritime dispute with Philippines. AFP reported Chinese general Luo Yuan on Thursday as condemning the increased US-Philippines cooperation.

Philippines is considered by the US as a key strategic base in the Southeast Asian region.

The US has also provided extensive help to Manila in its counterinsurgency operations against the New People’s Army, a Communist rebel movement.

Analysts credit the increased strategic focus of the US in this region as a part of a grant strategy of ‘Look East’ policy in the Pentagon.

சனி, 29 ஜூன், 2013

Hypocrisy at best: US policy towards Syria and Sri Lanka

Hypocrisy at best: US policy towards Syria and Sri Lanka

[TamilNet, Friday, 28 June 2013, 13:44 GMT]
US media reported on Wednesday that the CIA has begun shipping of arms to Syrian rebels to counter Bashar al-Assad’s forces. This move comes in spite of strong opposition from UNSC member Russia and warnings by a UN expert that increase in flow of weapons into Syria would only escalate the conflict. Likewise, American diplomat Susan Rice termed UNSC’s inaction on Syria a “stain” on the body. The hypocrisy of assisting Sri Lanka in its genocidal war on the Tamil nation while crying foul over al-Assad’s operations apart, the US through its actions on Syria makes it clear once again that the UNHRC, UNSC are of least concern should the US decide to intervene in a conflict. Given this nature of US foreign policy, till how long then will the Tamil Geneva pundits continue to believe in the impotent resolutions on Sri Lanka in the UNHRC, questions a political analyst in Colombo.

On Wednesday, British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights alleged that over a 100000 people had been killed since the beginning of the Syrian conflict in 2011.

Prior to this on Tuesday, addressing a press conference with US Secretary of State John Kerry, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister Saud al-Faisal accused that Syria’s offensives against the rebels constituted “genocide”, blaming Iran, Russia and the Lebanese Hezbollah for their support to Syrian President al-Assad.

Saudi Arabia, a key ally of the US in the middle-east, also called for military support to the Syrian rebels. This is in the wake of the Syrian regime securing several strategic victories over the rebels despite opinions in the beginning of the conflict that al-Assad could not hold on to power for long.

Citing US diplomats and officials, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that “The Central Intelligence Agency has begun moving weapons to Jordan from a network of secret warehouses and plans to start arming small groups of vetted Syrian rebels within a month, expanding U.S. support of moderate forces battling President Bashar al-Assad”. The weapons are believed to include both light ones like small arms and heavy types like anti-aircraft missiles.

However, other media organizations and activist networks claim that US aid to rebels will ultimately strengthen the hands of Islamist forces in Syria, which would only create great social and political instability in the country even if al-Assad regime is toppled.

The al-Assad regime receives military support from the Lebanese Hezbollah and Iran, and political support from Russia. Recent US-Russian talks on creating a peace agreement between the Syrian government and the rebels in Geneva failed. The US is going ahead with its decision to give legitimacy to the Syrian rebels despite opposition from Russia, a UNSC member, and other countries.

Ms Susan Rice, American diplomat who is leaving her post as the US ambassador to the UNSC, said in her departing remarks that she regrets that the UNSC failed to act decisively on Syria “as more than 90,000 Syrians have been killed and millions more displaced,” the BBC reported on Wednesday.

"The council's inaction on Syria is a moral and strategic disgrace that history will judge harshly," Ms Rice, soon to be national security advisor to American President Barack Obama, further said, opining that UNSC’s inaction on Syria was a “stain” on it.

Recently, the US had also condemned Syria for allegedly using chemical weapons against the rebels.

That Sri Lanka used chemical weapons during its war against the Eezham Tamils has been established.

That the US gave Sri Lanka the advice to use cluster bombs on the Tamil people has been noted by British author Paul Moorcraft in his book “Total Destruction of the Tamil Tigers”.

The usage of such brutal measures, which for the US is a crime worthy of intervening in the case of Syria, is a COIN operation to be studied in the case of Sri Lanka.

The US also doesn’t seem to apply the argument of ‘war crimes of both sides’ extensively used to discredit the LTTE, in the case of Syria.

A greater number of Tamil civilians were killed between January and May 2009 than the people allegedly killed since the beginning of the Syrian conflict. Indiscriminate bombing, shelling of hospitals and civilian ‘safe zones’, systematic torture and rape were all used by the Sri Lankan military as weapons against the Tamils.

Structural violence against the Tamils continues unabated against the Tamils in their occupied homeland as a protracted genocide even after the so-called ‘post-conflict’ situation. While the US State Department only counts trees of ‘human rights violations’ missing the context of genocide, the military minds in Pentagon have still not offered one serious negative criticism of the ‘Sri Lankan model’.

And while the US, its politicians and its diplomats are screaming bloody murder at al-Assad now, the United States Pacific Command together with Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Defence co-hosted a five-day workshop of the 17th Multi National Force Standing Operating Procedures in Colombo from 17th to 21st of June.

So while the US gives arms to the Syrian rebels to overthrow the “oppressive” al-Assad regime, to the Tamils living under genocidal oppression in Sri Lanka, it gives reconciliation.

Some pro-US elements in the Tamil society believe that the US will work against Sri Lanka as in the case of the various ‘Arab Springs’ that have happened in the recent past.

While the obvious fact of these ‘springs’ being little for than shoddy regime changes is missed, the other detail that is overlooked is that American interventions in these areas was not a result of resolutions in Geneva. It was a grand strategic manoeuvre designed by Pentagon to strengthen its sphere of influence in that region.

Given this nature of US foreign policy, till how long then will the Tamil Geneva pundits continue to believe in the impotent resolutions on Sri Lanka in the UNHRC, questions the political analyst in Colombo, considering that these have no bearing on America’s will to intervene in the favour of the Tamils in the island, if it wills it in the first place that is.

Given that the Pentagon has not given any indication whatsoever of any such strategic plans in the region that will benefit the Eezham Tamil nation, it is hard not to think of the US foreign policy as being against the interests of a permanent and just resolution of the Tamil national question.

In his article ‘The Folly of Eelam Punditry’ written in 2003 in the context of the peace-process, late TamilNet senior editor and analyst ‘Taraki’ Sivaram commented on the US bloc’s role that “The obfuscators, both professional and casual, in the media, academia and the diplomatic corps are active again with greater vigour and sophistication, aided in no small measure by the continuing folly and intellectual shallowness of the Eelam punditry, inducing widespread political dullness and apathy among the Tamil masses.”

This danger has amplified many times over after the internationally-abetted war on the de-facto state of Tamil Eelam. The biggest folly among the ‘Eelam punditry’ of the present being the blind approval of any report or resolution churned out by the West just because it is critical of the Rajapaksa regime – even if it denies the sovereignty of the Eezham Tamil nation or covers up the genocide.

The Eelam Punditry thronging the corridors of Geneva can pat themselves on the back if, and only if, they manage to convince the Pentagon to review its military-strategic approach towards Sri Lanka and if they get the US to haul Sri Lanka at the UNSC.

Anything short of that is deception of the worst kind, namely self-deception.

Related Articles:
04.06.13   Starting point of non-cooperation struggle
18.05.13   ‘Do not consider powers culpable in Tamil genocide as saviou..
11.05.13   Challenging enforced self-deceit
11.05.13   Genocide could be mandated by democracy of West: Malathy
17.01.11   'Pentagon blighting Tamil cause may turn counter-productive ..
23.06.10   Continuing ‘counter insurgency’ approach to chronic national..
08.05.09   'Post-conflict is post-Sri Lankan'
30.07.05   US's strategic interests in Sri Lanka- Taraki

திங்கள், 24 ஜூன், 2013

Snowden, Thulasi force US into legal extradition quagmire

Snowden, Thulasi force US into legal extradition quagmire

[TamilNet, Monday, 24 June 2013, 00:04 GMT]
In 2008, the United States Government requested the extradition of Eezham Tamil defendant, Thulasitharan Santhirarajah, from Australia for an alleged offense in providing material support to a "terrorist" organization, and now the US is requesting, or will request, the extradition of Edward J Snowden from Hong Kong, and other likely destinations of Snowden, for alleged offenses of “unauthorized communication of national defense information” and “willful communication of classified communications intelligence information to an unauthorized person." In the Thulasitharan case, the Melbourne Court determined that the charged offenses are "either pure or relative political offenses," and in the high-profile Snowden case, legal experts acknowledge that U.S. will likely meet with the same fate for similar reasons.

The U.S. Justice Department's complaint in the Eastern District Court of Virginia contained three charges that the defendant Snowden violated the provisions of:
  • 18 U.S.C. 641 Theft of Government Property
  • 18 U.S.C. 793(d) Unauthorized Communication of National Defense information
  • 18 U.S.C. 798(a)(3) Willfull Communication of Classified Communications Intelligence Information to Unauthorized Person
Edward J Snowden
Edward J Snowden
While legal experts believe Snowden admitted to the disclosure of secret information, and therefore, have lost any legal defense against the violations, other factors, domestic and international, might frustrate the US Government interests in prosecuting Snowden.

Locally, while NSA snooping has been deemed 'legal,' scholars believe that the NSA activities are likely unconstitutional and that the US Executive overreach has dangerously compromised "expectations of privacy." Snowden episode has triggered substantial debate in the media, making the issue an embarrassing political setback for the current US administration, giving the matter a political character.

In Santhirarajah v. Attorney General (Australia) the court determined that the AG erred in several legal issues, the two pertinent to Snowden case are that:
    On the political offense exception issue the four offenses charged by the US are "either pure or relative" political offenses, and therefore, the AG violated the exception clause in approving the extradition

    On the torture issue the AG erred in forming her satisfaction that the applicant will not be tortured. The court further added that the AG, in this issue, misunderstood that the obligation of the US was different from that of Australia under Article 3 of the UN Convention against Torture (CAT).
Historically, in jurisprudence, there has been tension between positive law, i.e., written law of a society...legal rules, statutes, regulations, and natural law, i.e., moral, ethical principles inherent in human nature. Snowden and Santhirarajah's actions likely fall into the space which can be reasonably characterized as morally defensible, and prosecuting individuals for such alleged crimes, while legal, are considered to fall under the political exception regime. While U.S. administration will argue the legality of its charges under positive law, Snowden may triumph with his increasing world-wide support underpinned by the natural law claims.

"There is a bar under Hong Kong's extradition law to extradition for an offence that is of a political character, [where] the prosecution is thought not just to be the application of the criminal law, but to crush that person or to crush their dissent," a Hong Kong based immigration lawyer, Mr Parker, told the BBC.

Another hurdle to extradition is related to the "well-founded fear of persecution," a doctrine that evolved from the asylum cases that help determine non-refoulement.

In Thulasitharan's case, the Melbourne court believed that the AG erred in her judgement in determining that the defendant will not face torture if he was extradited.

Similarly, a handover could also be halted if Mr Snowden was believed to be in danger of receiving inhumane treatment in the US, according to Mr Parker.

The treatment of Bradley Manning, the Army private who was charged for sending war-related and other classified U.S. documents to WikiLeaks, while in solitary confinement, which was described by the UN special rapporteur on torture as "cruel, inhuman and degrading", may bolster Snowden's chances of avoiding a US trial altogether by fighting extradition.

"In terms of seeking asylum, Snowden would definitely qualify in terms of fear of persecution," a legal expert said. "Bradley Manning would be exhibit A in that argument."

International media reported that, Snowden, after flying to Moscow, has sought asylum in Ecuador, and is speculated to be travelling to Ecuador via Cuba soon. Wikileaks staff and legal counsel are said to be assisting Snowden, according to reports.

Meanwhile, US officials watching Mr Snowden’s movements from afar, "expressed private and public fury with both Russia and Hong Kong," and also cancelled Snowden's passport.

Related Articles:
09.09.12   Australia deals legal setback to US on extradition cases
01.09.12   Australian Court denies US extradition request
31.07.12   Australia's extradition of Tamil to US violates due process,..


External Links:
WP:  U.S. charges Snowden with espionage
BLR: The Twilight Zone of Positive and Natural Law
CSM: Harsh prison treatment for Manning
Cornell: 18 U.S.C. 641
HK: Fugitive Offenders Order (US and Hong Kong)
WP: NSA surveillance may be legal — but it’s unconstitutional
Economist:  Cost-benefit analysis and state secrecy: Foiled plots and bathtub falls
DT: Edward Snowden seeks Ecuador asylum
BBC: Sheltering Snowden
Cornell: 18 U.S.C. 793
Guardian: Catch-all Espionage Act would leave Snowden with little room for defence
Cornell: 18 U.S.C. 798
NYT: U.S. Petitions for Extradition in N.S.A. Case

புதன், 12 ஜூன், 2013

Rapp disappointed at Sri Lanka's lack of accountability to atrocities

Rapp disappointed at Sri Lanka's lack of accountability to atrocities

[TamilNet, Wednesday, 12 June 2013, 00:58 GMT]
US Ambassador at Large on War Crimes Issues, Stephen J. Rapp, during his visit to the UN in New York June 11, said on Sri Lanka, he is disappointed on the "accountability for the alleged grave atrocities near the end of the conflict on both sides," and on the lack of implementation of the provisions of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission, Inner City Press (ICP) which covers UN, said.

With UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay now scheduled to visit Sri Lanka, Rapp said that the most recent resolution invites Pillay "and the Special Rapporteurs to work with" Sri Lanka's Rapapaksa government "to overcome these deficits," ICP reported.

Rapp said the US will be "watching that very carefully" to decide what steps are necessary, according to the ICP.

Meanwhile, ICP's Matthew Lee said he had planned to ask the UK Prime Minister Cameron "about going to Sri Lanka for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, given its "accountability" record," during the publicized scheduled stakeout session in the UN last month, but the Prime Minister instead entertained one question from the Reuters.

Related Articles:
06.04.12   Boyle compares Syria action, dismisses UNHRC resolution as a..
27.12.11   Tragedy of US policy on Sri Lanka's war crimes
01.07.10   Tamil groups meet US War Crimes Ambassador
20.06.10   US says Sri Lanka Commission does not meet [International] s..
28.11.09   Rapp snubs Sri Lanka's comment to US's war crimes investigat..
15.09.09   US's war crimes report, a canary in coalmine - Rapp


External Links:
ICP: Cameron "Understands" A There's a Syria Question from Reuters & UNCA, Censors on Sri Lanka
ICP: On Sri Lanka, US Rapp Disappointed on Accountability, Watching Pillay Go

வெள்ளி, 7 ஜூன், 2013

"US action on Sri Lanka necessary to protect Tamils"

"US action on Sri Lanka necessary to protect Tamils"

[TamilNet, Wednesday, 05 June 2013, 00:22 GMT]
Dr. Karunyan Arulanantham, the executive director of the Tamil American Peace Initiative, an organization of American Tamils, in a article in the CNN World website says, "[j]udging by recent history, one thing seems clear: Sri Lanka won’t solve its problems on its own," and advocating that "U.S. pressure is necessary," suggests that "[a] U.N. mechanism that would allow the international community to act decisively and initiate independent investigations and conduct a U.N. supervised referendum on options for peaceful coexistence is long overdue. This is by far the best way to achieve real reconciliation."

Full text of the article follows:

Time for U.S. pressure on Sri Lanka

Amid the jungle and sandy beaches of northeast Sri Lanka’s Vanni region lie tragic truths the government has desperately sought to suppress in the four years since its civil war with the Liberation Tamil Tigers of Eelam (LTTE) came to a sudden and gory halt. On the Mullivaikal peninsula, between the Nanthikadal Lagoon and the sea just north of the town of Mullaithivu, the government declared a safe zone, where hundreds of thousands of Tamil civilians were trapped as they sought refuge from the bloodshed.

What happened next is almost unimaginable. Seeking to crush the LTTE once and for all, the government proceeded to shell the No Fire Zone and surrounding areas after assuring the world that they would not use heavy weapons. The government declared victory over the LTTE in late May 2009, but in doing so, tens of thousands of innocent Tamil civilians were also killed by government forces.

According to the U.N. Panel of Experts on Sri Lanka, as many as 40,000 civilians may have been killed during the war’s final stages, while “only a proper investigation can lead to the identification of all of the victims and to the formulation of an accurate figure.” Some analysts paint an even starker picture. The Catholic Bishop of Mannar, Joseph Rayappu, has testified that over 140,000 civilians remain unaccounted for since the fall of 2008.

In March, the U.N. Human Rights Council (UNHRC) passed a resolution calling for the Sri Lankan government to “conduct an independent and credible investigation into allegations of violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law” that occurred during the war’s final stages. But how honest are we being with ourselves when we ask a government that stands chief among the accused to credibly and independently investigate its own wrongdoing?

More from CNN: Tamils want inquiry

In fact, the government continues to promote the very same climate of oppression and indifference that largely fueled Sri Lanka’s ethnic conflict and led to civil war.

The UNHRC is well aware of this, citing in its report the continuation of “enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, torture, and violations of the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly, as well as intimidation of and reprisals against human rights defenders, members of civil society and journalists, threats to judicial independence and the rule of law, and discrimination on the basis of religion or belief.”

These alleged transgressions were echoed in last year’s U.S. State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, which also noted “a lack of accountability for thousands who disappeared in previous years; and widespread impunity for a broad range of human rights abuses, particularly involving police torture, and attacks on media institutions and the judiciary.”

Meanwhile, the Tamils in particular continue to be marginalized, demonized and endangered. They are denied political representation and economic opportunity while enduring the seizure and militarization of their homes and lands. The latest reported land grab by the army is the alleged seizure of 6,381 acres of land belonging to Tamils in just one small northern area of Valikamam, although others have also been claimed.

After the war, the government scrapped the singing of the national anthem in Tamil at official functions, and is quickly and decisively dismantling the cultural identity of the Tamils.

Aware of all this, what is the international community waiting for? A U.N. mechanism that would allow the international community to act decisively and initiate independent investigations and conduct a U.N. supervised referendum on options for peaceful coexistence is long overdue. This is by far the best way to achieve real reconciliation.

The Tamil people deserve to have their rights protected. Yet they now face a systematic attempt by a conquering, vindictive government to erase them from the country’s future and the nation’s collective memory. By definition, you can’t have reconciliation or stability when certain groups are perennially subjugated.

Meanwhile, the Sri Lankan government has mounted an expensive public relations strategy that denies and distracts from the real issues the country faces. It promises to take meaningful steps forward, but only makes halfhearted attempts in the hopes that more years will pass, and the international community will forget. But forgetting the past will only ensure it is repeated.

Because the government won’t pursue truth and reconciliation, the international community must. And the United States should take the lead on such an effort. As President Obama said on May 13, 2009 as the war neared its end, “Going forward, Sri Lanka must seek a peace that is secure and lasting, and grounded in respect for all of its citizens.”

Judging by recent history, one thing seems clear: Sri Lanka won’t solve its problems on its own.

External Links:
CNN: Time for U.S. pressure on Sri Lanka

திங்கள், 29 ஏப்ரல், 2013

Indo-US manoeuvrings impact TNA's political future

Indo-US manoeuvrings impact TNA's political future

[TamilNet, Sunday, 28 April 2013, 23:30 GMT]
The sophisticated competition between the Establishments of the USA and India in winning Colombo to their side exploiting the plight of the genocide affected nation of Eezham Tamils, has resulted in divisions among the constituent parties of the Tamil National Alliance. The exploitations now revolve around the provincial council elections. Informed sources said that EPRLF Varathar-wing has been recently consulted by New Delhi. Likewise, the son of the late SJV Chelvanayakam and a son of the late A. Amirthalingam have also been consulted by India to back up the ITAK faction that has been aligning with India. Informed circles further told TamilNet that the US officials have been disappointed with the ITAK alignment with New Delhi.

In the meantime, US officials have stepped up their engagement in Jaffna, eyeing the developments within the former High Security Zone that is being converted into a Sinhala Military Zone (SMZ).

Protests are encouraged, but whether they would serve Tamil interests or the bargaining interests of the powers with Colombo, wonder Tamil circles in the island.

India, China and the USA have been competing to gain access to the SMZ. Sinhala militarisation of the country of Eezham Tamils is not their problem. They all want the militarisation, but who gets the benefits is their problem, commented political observers in Jaffna.

Meanwhile, the competitions in capturing Tamil polity and in finding convenient personalities ‘to devolve power’ result in causing crisis within the TNA, news sources said.

On Saturday, one of the parties in the TNA alliance, the Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO), led by Selvam Adaikkalanathan MP, resolved to give two weeks time for the unity efforts now being facilitated by Mannaar Bishop Rt. Rev. Dr. Rayappu Joseph.

The TELO was seeking a fresh Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the future TNA, which should be a registered body, the TELO said in a statement released on Sunday.

If the unity effort is going to fail, TELO, joining hands with EPRLF led by Suresh Premachandran, PLOTE led by T. Sitharthan and the TULF led by V. Anandasangaree would be taking steps to register the TNA, the statement further said.

The reaction from the TELO, reflecting the sentiments of EPRLF (Suresh) wing has its origins from the arguments put forward by ITAK stalwarts that ITAK should have a dominant role in the functioning of the TNA.

Meanwhile, informed sources told TamilNet that the four parties are to meet on Monday to discuss the future.

At the same time, Mr. R. Sampanthan has also responded to media reports.

“There is much speculation in the media, some of which is unfortunately mischievous in regard to dissension within the TNA,” Mr Sampanthan told the gathering at late Mr.S.J.V.Chelvanayakam memorial event held Friday evening in Colombo, hinting at the reports that have appeared in local media.

“I wish to categorically state that there is no dissension whatever, within the TNA on any matter of policy, pertaining to the future of the Tamil people. Every constituent party of the TNA is committed to unitedly working towards a future for the Tamil people marked by equality, self-respect, dignity and the fulfilment of their legitimate aspirations. We are a political formation that functions on the principles of democracy and we are confident that all of us have the commitment and the capacity to resolve any differences pertaining to our internal matters ourselves, in a manner acceptable to all of us without playing into the hands of opponents primarily interested in damaging the future of the Tamil people”, Mr Sampanthan has claimed.

Chronology:

ஞாயிறு, 7 ஏப்ரல், 2013

Colombo, Shuler, new US lobby firm, cozy alliance rumored

Colombo, Shuler, new US lobby firm, cozy alliance rumored

[TamilNet, Sunday, 07 April 2013, 00:02 GMT]
Colombo has inked a lobbying and government affairs contract with the US-based "The Majority Group," after the previous lobby firm, Patton Boggs, terminated its representation of Sri Lanka in early February, sources in Washington said. While the diplomatic performance of Jaliya Wickremesuriya, Sri Lanka's President's relative and the current Ambassador to Sri Lanka in Washington, has been lackluster, Wickremasuriya-mooted relationship with North Carolina Congressman, Heath Shuler, is rumored to have played a role in the selection of the lobby firm, even while the Congressman's nexus to the Majority group has raised questions on the "revolving door" ambitions of Shuler, political sources in Washington said.

The two-year old Majority Group was founded by Capitol Hill veteran Rob Ellsworth, former Congressman Walt Minnick (D-ID), former Congressman Charles Djou (R-HI), and Wall Street attorney Chris DiAngelo.

"We're excited to work with Sri Lanka on a number of issues important to both of our countries. As a small boutique firm, we are able to give constant and individualized attention to our clients; I know that was very important to Sri Lanka," Ellsworth is reported to have said according to the Politico website.

Congressman Heath Shuler (D-11th District NC)
Congressman Heath Shuler (D-11th District NC)
The following facts on the Colombo, Shuler, and The Majority nexus are feeding the rumor mill in Washington, especially on Shuler if his Majority Group deal is "Bribery, or Legitimate Career Change?":
  • Sri Lanka Embassy funds Rep. Shulers trip to Vanni after the end of war.
  • Shuler provides much needed positive propaganda for Colombo complimenting Rajapakses of the transparency and the treatment of Tamils in internment camps.
  • The Majority Group co-founder Ellsworth served as a key Aide [Legislative Assistant] to Shuler.
  • The Revolving Door: Heath Shuler, who is about to quit Congress, is reportedly already talking to different lobbying firms, assessing his options. One of the organizations taking a serious look at Shuler is The Majority Group.
  • Colombo hires Ellsewood's The Majority Group to represent Sri Lanka in the US for lobbying activities.
Knowledgeable political sources in Washington commented that "while some call this phenomenon [Shuler and The Majority Group's mutually beneficial acts involving financial deals] the "revolving door," the line between casual bribery and simply changing careers is incredibly fuzzy. How do we know that lawmakers like Shuler aren't influenced [in law making] by the lobbying firms already promising them cash?," the political pundits ask.

Sri Lanka’s central bank recently inked a separate contract with Thompson Advisory Group to promote the country’s economic interests.

Chronology:


External Links:
AU: AU appallingly provides platform to oppressive regime
PB: Patton Boggs LLP
MG: The Majority Group

திங்கள், 25 மார்ச், 2013

New US Secretary of State responsible for Geneva injustice: Boyle

New US Secretary of State responsible for Geneva injustice: Boyle

[TamilNet, Sunday, 24 March 2013, 15:15 GMT]
The New US Secretary of State John Kerry, who assumed office on 1 Feb 2013, was the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations in 2009 that brought out a report advising the USA to help Sri Lanka’s military without insisting on political solutions. Finding a clear link between the 2009 Kerry Report and Kerry’s State Department, US Professor of Law, Francis A Boyle said, "The callous and callow Kerry Report came right after the GOSL genocidal massacre of about 100,000 Tamils in Vanni, recommending that the United States government abandon all principles and instead aid and abet the continued GOSL repression and persecution of the Tamils. That is precisely the policy we now see in operation with Kerry as U.S. Secretary of State. This latest UNHRC Resolution sponsored by Kerry’s State Department and acting pursuant to his instructions proves it. Kerry should be fired," said Boyle.
PDF IconUS-Kerry press release on Geneva
resolution on Sri Lanka
The U.S. Secretary of State, John Kerry's recent press statement which characterized the UNHRC Sri Lanka resolution as encouraging "the Government of Sri Lanka to continue on the path toward lasting peace and prosperity following decades of civil war and instability," and which expressed U.S.'s readiness "to continue engagement" with Colombo, and sidestepped accountability for the war-crimes committed by Sri Lanka, has alarmed Tamil activists, and raised the specter of a resumption of a passive US policy based on the 2009-Kerry report. This report was assailed by rights groups as "incredibly shoddy, ill-informed piece of work that grossly overstates the strategic importance of Sri Lanka to the U.S. and woefully understates the degree of abuses carried out by Colombo."
The December 2009 Report, "Sri Lanka: Recharting U.S. Strategy after the War," released by the Committee on Foreign Relations of which John Kerry was the chairman, recommended, inter alia:
John Kerry, US Secretary of State
John Kerry, US Secretary of State
US should focus on economy and security of the island instead of humanitarian considerations, IDPs and civil society; should also invest in Sinhalese parts of the country instead of just focusing on North and East; should resume training of Sri Lankan military officials to ensure human rights in future operations as well as to build critical relationships and implied that US should not emphasize on political reform as a condition to assistance, bringing rift in US- Sri Lanka relations making the latter to align with countries of alternative model of development.

Diaspora circles commented after the release of the Kerry report that while pre-2006 US policy gave verbal precedence to political solution over military solution, and later provided support to a military solution, has now isolated the Tamil national struggle as a non-entity in U.S.'s geopolitical considerations.

Rights group slammed the contents of 2009 Kerry report. "Maybe the people who wrote the report don’t know anything about Sri Lanka or maybe they’re of the school that says that everything on the planet is strategic," said Brad Adams, Asia director for Human Rights Watch. "The huge human-rights and humanitarian problems that continue there are not small; they’re central to any principled diplomatic engagement with Sri Lanka at this point. So [the notion] that we are in a competition with China, which I think is driving this, is misplaced," Adams further said.

In this context, the Secretary of State Kerry's statement on the UNHCR resolution has dismayed Tamil diaspora circles over the possible ominous policy evolution in a downward direction as regards Tamils' future welfare, and on the possible adverse impact to the Tamil struggle seeking justice, accountability, and assertion of political and fundamental rights.

Chronology: