Pattanam antiquity authenticated by radiocarbon dating
Science validates history at Pattanam, located 25 km
north of Kochi and identified as Muziris, lost port town frequented by
Roman traders. Nuclear physicists have confirmed what archaeologists had
proposed: the 3,000 year timeline of this village and its trade
connections with Rome. Doubts, if any, about the antiquity of Pattanam
appear settled.
Molecular biologists too are at work
in Pattanam. Their DNA analysis of excavated human remains would answer
questions about the origins of Pattanam inhabitants. Did Dravidians,
Europeans and Africans live in this village near the Kerala coast?
Archaeologists
of the Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR), over the last
seven years, had unearthed thousands of artefacts in Pattanam.
Based
on a careful analysis of the material evidence and a close study of the
stratigraphy (layers of deposits), experts had suggested that Pattanam
was inhabited from Iron Age (10th Century BCE to 5th century BCE) and
Roman trade peaked between 1st century BCE and 4th century CE.
However,
the KCHR did not undertake a comprehensive carbon dating of the objects
so far. This had raised questions about the accuracy of proposed
chronology. Suggestions about the multicultural setting of the lost city
also needed supportive evidence.
Last year, the KCHR
decided to corroborate their findings. They sought the help of G.V.
Ravi Prasad of the Center for Applied Isotope Studies (CAIS), University
of Georgia, U.S. The CAIS, using Accelerator Mass Spectrometry,
analysed 13 organic samples that included bone fragments, charcoal bits
and frankincense taken from different layers of two trenches.
The results validated Pattanam’s timeline and its links with Romans.
A
sample of frankincense, probably brought from Saudi Arabia and found at
4.2 metre depth, is among the oldest objects. This, as carbon analysis
reveals, is datable to 356 to 196 BCE and predates the Roman phase.
A
piece of charcoal, found along with carnelian stone beads, gold
filament and amphora shreds, at 3 metre depth is dated to 111 to 40 BCE
when trade with Roman empire was active in Pattanam.
The
only note of discordance between carbon and archaeological dating is
regarding the layers containing bone fragments. The carbon analysis has
found the bone fragments older than what archaeologists think.
Dr.
Prasad, in a brief note provided by the KCHR, explained that this
difference, which is about 300 years, could be due to the nature of the
sample material.
“The carbon isotopic composition of
a bone can be different after burning due to exchange with the fuel
used for burning,” he said.
Study on skeletal remains
Niraj
Rai, molecular biologist with the Centre for Cellular and Molecular
Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, is studying the skeletal remains excavated in
Pattanam.
“The morphological features of the
remains suggest that they are of human origin,” he said. The samples,
about 13 of them, would be tested at the advanced DNA laboratory dealing
with ancient human skeletal materials in the CCMB.
“DNA
would be extracted from the samples and the mitochondrial DNA would be
sequenced and matched with both published and unpublished DNA data base
of modern human beings throughout the world,” Mr. Rai said.
“Depending
on the mitochondrial sequences and their match, we can ascertain
whether the human remains are that of Romans or Dravidians or Africans.”
The results of this analysis would be known in a couple of weeks.
P.J.
Cherian, Director, Pattanam Excavations, said “this exercise, which
corroborates the chronological assumptions derived from the excavation
data, reiterates the importance of archaeo-science and need to invest
more in this field. We expect the Archaeological Survey of India and
Oxford University to directly participate in the excavations in future.’
Keywords: Pattanam antiquity,
These areas were part of ancient Tamil country!!
from:
Venkatesan
Posted on: May 22, 2013 at 12:54 IST
Great finding. There were some opposition from some historians like MGS.Narayanan, which now seems to have turned false.
from:
Roopesh P Raj
Posted on: May 22, 2013 at 10:55 IST