EPW லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி
EPW லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி

ஞாயிறு, 4 ஆகஸ்ட், 2013

New Delhi insists on use of Hindi script for Konkani language

New Delhi insists on use of Hindi script for Konkani language

[TamilNet, Sunday, 04 August 2013, 07:14 GMT]
New Delhi Establishment’s Sahitya Academy insists on Konkani language, spoken in coastal Maharashtra, Goa, coastal Karnataka and parts of Kerala, to present literature in the Nagari script of Hindi/ Sanskrit, for consideration of its awards, said a feature appeared in the Economic & Political Weekly (EPW), dated 03 August. At present, the Konkani language, which was recognized as a major national language of India in 1992, is written in 5 scripts: Kannada, Roman, Malayalam, Nagari and Persian-Arabic, depending on the State where it is spoken. 45 per cent of the Konkani speakers, the largest group, live in Karnataka, where the script of Konkani is Kannada. 40 per cent of the speakers are in Goa, where the language is mostly written in Roman.

However, “most of the awards and recognitions today, particularly those conferred by Central Sahitya Academy, invariably require that the concerned writings are made available in the Nagari script. Some of them feel that such a demand is not merely unfair, but it challenges their very sense of belonging expressed through a script native to them,” said the EPW feature “ Konkani: The Script Controversy” by Valerian Rodrigues of the Centre for Political Studies of the JNU.

“The existing practice of considering works only written in Nagari for awards and recognition by public agencies cannot be endorsed. Writings in all scripts should be considered for the purpose,” the feature further said.

* * *

The argument for the use of Nagari for Konkani is that it will help ‘national’ integration of Konkani in India better.

With the same argument, New Delhi is now imposing the Nagari script among the script-less tribal languages in the newly created tribal states such as Chhatthisgarh and Jharkhand in Central India, where most of the tribes are Dravidian or Austro-Asiatic speakers.

Many of them who were using the Oriya script or Telugu script are now encouraged to use Nagari. As some of the tribes have demographic contiguity with the proposed new State of Telangana carved out of Andhra, Nagari may make inroads into the Telugu State also.

Nagari, which evolved as the script of Sanskrit in Northern India, also became the script of Hindi when it became an identifiable language in the times of the Moghals after 16th century.

In Southern India, Sanskrit was written in Grantham, a script that evolved locally and introduced phonetic writing even to far away places such as the Pacific islands. But elite in the South willingly sacrificed Grantham in the early 20th century to have uniformity in printed Sanskrit. It is now a forgotten script due to the monopoly of Nagari in writing Sanskrit.

Marathi accepted Nagari as its script in the 20th century.

In historical times, the Kannada script was prevalent even in Maharashtra for the writing of Marathi.

A fear among the Konkani population is that by the use of Nagari, Marathi that is vying with Konkani especially in Goa may try to make inroads into that State and their language.

Konkani is the State official language in Goa, recognized since 1987.

Konkani speaking people, especially the Catholic sections in Goa, prefer Roman script introduced by the Portuguese, as it would help their diaspora, universal readability and international interaction of the language.

But the influential Brahmin sections among the Konkani speakers have already started using Nagari. This may marginalise the folk echelons of the Konkani people, is yet another concern.

* * *

The script controversy may look meaningless since all the Indian alphabets have evolved from a common alphabet. The colonial Orientalists who deciphered the alphabet in the 19th century named it “Brahmi,” getting the term from a list of the script names of the past.

Nagari evolved from ‘Brahmi’ with linear characters because of the writing material used in Northern India, which was tree bark and reed pen.

In Southern India and in most of the coastal India, including in Ceylon, the scripts evolved from ‘Brahmi’ were curvilinear due to the use of palmyra or talipot palm leaves and stylus as writing material. There is a strong connection between the natural distribution of palmyra-talipot palms and curvilinear scripts.

Historically, Konkani comes under the curvilinear script region.

Script or scripts of a language is its identity as well as continuity with its literary heritage. More than that, in the case of Konkani, the script decides the demographic, cultural and literary contiguity and interaction of the speakers with their immediate and traditional neighbours.

While the New Delhi Establishment, Hindi enthusiasts and BJP-RSS-Shiv Sena sections visualise ‘national’ integration through entering into written Konkani with Nagari, which less that 15 per cent of the Konkani-speaking people use, it will create a wedge in the Dravidian States, between Konkanis and Kannadigas in Karnataka and between Konkanis and Malayalis in Kerala.

Nagas and Mizos of North-East India have gone for Roman script long back as a response to the games of ‘dominant’ formations.

Tamil Nadu that was in the forefront to resist Hindi in the 1950s and 60s failed in voicing, helping and interacting with others in India facing similar plights later.

It is of utmost importance for the grassroot people’s movements in Tamil Nadu to consciously make a strong bondage with the peoples of North-East States, tribal states and others of similar situations, as such a bondage only will help in the long run in facing the bulldozing designs of imperialism in the Establishment.

Tulu, an identifiable Dravidian language, which was historically written in Grantham, Vattezhuththu, Malayalam and Kannada, also faced a similar situation like Konkani. It is now written in Kannada due to its predominant demographic confinement to Karnataka.

Let the Konkani speakers decide on the question of their script in ways that suit them. But the injustice shown by New Delhi’s Sahitya Academy to Konkani writers in scripts other than Nagari is a form of cultural genocide and that has to be resisted and condemned by all those in India and outside, who care for literary and cultural heritage.

External Links:
EPW: Konkani: The Script Controversy

வியாழன், 5 ஜூலை, 2012

EPW article on Palk Bay fishermen misses crux of the matter

EPW article on Palk Bay fishermen misses crux of the matter

[TamilNet, Thursday, 05 July 2012, 06:30 GMT]
The Mumbai-based Economic and Political Weekly (EPW) in a 23 June article on trans-boundary fishing incursions in the Palk Bay reduces the issue as arising from mere “unequal technological developments” between the sides of the bay. The article misses or doesn’t want to see the larger issue: the overlapping imperialist and genocidal agendas respectively of the establishments in New Delhi and Colombo carrying out a two-pronged attack on the nation of Eezham Tamils, ultimately to grab their coasts and seas. Colombo’s military and Sinhala fishermen occupying the coasts of Eezham Tamils and New Delhi setting Tamil fishermen on either side against each other are not two different issues. The fundamental flaw of the EPW article is that it sees the affected party as ‘Sri Lankan fishermen’ while in truth even the Sri Lankan state doesn’t see them in that spirit, commented an academic in Jaffna.

Approaching the conflict from the endogenous –exogenous framework, and concluding that it is “an archetypal example of an exogenous conflict,” in which the power balance weighs heavily on the Indian side both in terms of technology and at the level of geopolitics, the authors of the article find the solutions currently proposed as inappropriate.

A concluding suggestion of the article is to convert the exogenous conflict into a more manageable endogenous one, by creating an umbrella institution that would provide a platform of interaction for all relevant parties.

How to come out with an umbrella institution without recognizing the sovereignty of Eezham Tamils over their land and waters, asked the academic in Jaffna.

“The scenario today is such, the sovereignty and self-determination of the nation Eezham Tamils are deliberately denied and a structural genocide for the annihilation of their nation is systematically carried out by both New Delhi and Colombo.

“Setting the fishermen of Tamil Nadu against the Eezham Tamil fishermen is also encouraged and orchestrated with a long-term agenda of ultimately clearing the social control of the waters for bringing in corporate and military control. Military-corporate enclaves in KKS, Mannaar and Trincomalee are already in the making, coupled with bio-carbon and navigation projects in the Palk Bay.

“The balance weighs heavily against Eezham Tamils not only in comparison to the Tamil Nadu fishermen but also in comparison to the Sinhala fishermen who come with military and technology.

“The approach to the issue with the endogenous-exogenous jargon within the existing framework of states on either side of the bay would never work in the given context. Any umbrella institution to sort out the fishermen issue that doesn’t recognize the sovereignty of Eezham Tamils would only lead them to compromise with their subjugation,” said the academic in Jaffna.

J. Scholtens and M Bavinck of the University of Amsterdam and A S Soosai of the Department of Geography of the University of Jaffna have authored the article, “Fishing in Dire Straits, Trans-Boundary Incursions in the Palk Bay,” appeared in the EPW.

The article was based on a study funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. 25 students of the University of Jaffna conducted field surveys for the researchers.

External Links:
EPW: Fishing in Dire Straits