south africa லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி
south africa லேபிளுடன் இடுகைகளைக் காண்பிக்கிறது. அனைத்து இடுகைகளையும் காண்பி

புதன், 11 டிசம்பர், 2013

Mandela and the other Prisoners of War

Mandela and the other Prisoners of War

[TamilNet, Monday, 09 December 2013, 11:56 GMT]
As South Africa prepares for the funeral of iconic anti-apartheid leader Nelson Mandela, who passed away at the age of 95 on Thursday, leaders of the world have paid their tributes to the man who was incarcerated as a political prisoner under the apartheid regime for 27 years. Powerful countries in the West, including the USA and UK, which had once denounced Mandela as a ‘terrorist’, are now in the forefront paying homage. However, these establishments still continue to support countries that practice illegal detention and brutal treatment of prisoners-of-war (PoW). Noting this hypocrisy, a British-Kurdish activist, drawing a comparison between Mandela and PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan who has been kept in solitary confinement in a Turkish prison for 13 years, questions how one political leader is considered a “freedom fighter” and the other a “terrorist”.

Ruwayda Mustafah, a Kurdish writer and activist based in the UK, writing in the site Kurdishvoices.com on 6 December, argues “Abdullah Ocalan, similar to Nelson Mandela has renounced violence, continuously called for dialogue, peace, diplomacy and understanding between Kurdish people and the Turkish state.”

“He has played an instrumental role in supporting the peace-process in Turkey, although little credit has been attributed to him within the Turkish media in his role as a peace-mediator.”

“When people mourn Nelson Mandela, his legendary work, and praise his strength, I wonder, do they do the same for Abdullah Ocalan? What I don’t understand is, how is it that we have come to accept the imprisonment of Abdullah Ocalan as “justifiable” but not that of Nelson Mandela?

“Surely, if Mandela’s imprisonment was unwarranted (and no doubt it was) then the same line of reasoning/logic can be applied to Ocalan.”

Currently, Turkey is a strategic partner of the USA.

That these establishments that talk about human rights abuses alone but fail to challenge Sri Lanka over the question of hundreds of LTTE cadres who continue to remain PoWs without any sort of legal aid and are being subject to routine abuse should be no surprise.

While the Mandela that the establishments promote is the architect of ‘reconciliation’ – and this Mandela is acceptable by Sinhala leaders including those like Ranil Wickremesinghe to justify the fundamentally flawed LLRC recommendations and the unitary state of Sri Lanka – the other Mandela they would like to obfuscate would be the uncompromising fighter against structural racism.

However, Mandela fought in a completely different context. Apartheid South Africa was a racist state privileging the minority whites over the majority blacks, practicing structural discrimination against the latter.

Whereas Sri Lanka is a genocidal state that seeks the annihilation of the Eezham Tamil nation through structural genocide.

Tamil activists perceive that Mandela’s relevance to the Tamils lies more in the zeal with which he pursued his political goals strategically.

They join the world community in remembering the iconic leader.

வியாழன், 16 மே, 2013

Sri Lanka’s human rights record as bad as South Africa under Apartheid': Haigh

Sri Lanka’s human rights record as bad as South Africa under Apartheid': Haigh

[TamilNet, Thursday, 16 May 2013, 11:41 GMT]
Criticizing Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr’s support to holding the CHOGM in Sri Lanka, former Australian diplomat Bruce Haigh opined that Sri Lanka at the head of the Commonwealth would bring the institution’s demise, arguing that “Sri Lanka has a human rights record as bad as South Africa under Apartheid.” In an article for ABC News on Thursday, Mr. Haigh further said that despite evidence to the contrary, Bob Carr “believes that the Sinhalese majority are free of triumphalism and ethnic abuse of Tamils, amounting to state sponsored genocide, following a bloody civil war that occurred because of the very attitudes and practices being deployed against Tamils today.” Asserting that the Rajapaksa regime undermines the values of the Commonwealth, the author further called on Australia to boycott the CHOGM.

Excerpts from Bruce Haigh’s article ‘Boats should not stop a CHOGM boycott’ published on ABC News follows:

“In the face of a great deal of evidence to the contrary, Bob Carr has declared Sri Lanka an ideal democracy.”

“He has declared their institutions sound, and scoffed at the idea of corruption within the ranks of the Rajapaksa government.”

“He has declared the police, army and navy to be clear of charges of detaining and torturing members of the Tamil minority. He believes that the Sinhalese majority are free of triumphalism and ethnic abuse of Tamils, amounting to state sponsored genocide, following a bloody civil war that occurred because of the very attitudes and practices being deployed against Tamils today.”

“And why has Carr adopted such a serendipitous attitude to Sri Lanka? It's called boats, where the curtailment of asylum seekers arriving off Australian shores overrides human rights and all other considerations of compassion and common sense. In order that the bipartisan policy of turning back, preventing or in some other way stopping the boats from sullying our shores, Carr must declare that everything is hunky dory in Sri Lanka and that anyone getting in a boat, risking their lives and spending money they don't have must be economic refugees; and a range of acolytes seeking government preferment puppet his response.”

“As a result of the Sri Lankan government's failure to investigate war crimes and because of its participation in ongoing repression of Tamils, the Canadian government has said it will boycott this year's CHOGM to be held in Sri Lanka. Should this meeting go ahead Sri Lanka will head the Commonwealth for the next two years. This is despite the fact that the Rajapaska regime undermines, on a daily basis, the values and principles of the Commonwealth.”

“Carr has rubbished the stand taken by Canada. The Queen has advised that she will not be attending; no doubt seeking to avoid the controversy that will inevitably surround the meeting should it go ahead. By accepting the mantle as head of the Commonwealth, Sri Lanka could well bring about its demise. Sri Lanka has a human rights record as bad as South Africa under Apartheid. It would have been unthinkable for South Africa to have hosted a CHOGM, so why is Sri Lanka being shoe horned into the job? In fact, so gravely were South Africa's human rights abuses viewed that the Commonwealth instituted sanctions, followed not long after by the UN.”

“ASIO does not have an independent capacity to gather information on the ground about persons of interest. They must rely on a friendly or cooperative government to provide them with police clearances and checks. We could not do that with Apartheid South Africa, although ASIO did maintain unofficial contact with the ruthless South African Bureau of State Security, and contact with countries behind The Iron Curtin, during the Cold War, for purposes of obtaining security clearances, did not happen.”

“For ASIO to continue its campaign against persons linked to the LTTE it must go along with the fiction that Sri Lanka is a neat and tidy democracy and is not conducting a post war vendetta against the Tamils and the military wing in that dispute, the LTTE.”

“In all conscience Australia must also boycott CHOGM.”

Chronology:

ஞாயிறு, 17 பிப்ரவரி, 2013

Swiss, South Africa reconciliation attempt in Sri Lanka ‘ill-conceived’, says ICG

Swiss, South Africa reconciliation attempt in Sri Lanka ‘ill-conceived’, says ICG

[TamilNet, Saturday, 16 February 2013, 00:59 GMT]
Switzerland's backing of a South African post-Apartheid reconciliation initiative to bring adversarial parties in Sri Lanka to the negotiating table, is ill-conceived and has little chance of yielding any positive results, Alan Keenan, an ICG [International Crisis Group] Sri Lanka expert commented. Keenan "accused the Sri Lankan government of having no interest in fair negotiations with Tamil political parties, no intention to devolve meaningful power to the Tamil-majority northern province or the Tamil-speaking majority eastern province, and of going back on its many promises." The Swiss government funding and the South African brokering were behind the GTF convened and Burghof Foundation facilitated Berlin conference, informed circles say.

The ICG's open criticism on the move is quite significant in understanding the competition among the Establishments of powers and their privatised ‘peace facilitation’ corporates, political observers commented.

While the pliant Tamil National Alliance (TNA), with its propensity for expressing willingness to compromise on long-standing core demands of Tamils on nationhood and the right to self determination, sent a delegation to South Africa to strengthen contacts earlier this month, and officials from Sri Lanka and South Africa have been visited each other several times in the last few years, ICG warned in a report last November that “[g]overnments concerned with sustainable peace in Sri Lanka also need to be careful that their desire for constructive engagement does not end up facilitating Colombo’s intransigence and delaying tactics.”

"Current policies towards Tamils, especially in the northern province, were undermining their rights and damaging the prospects of a lasting political settlement," Keenan said, adding, “It is very important that both the Swiss government and the South African government make this lack of progress clear to the world and not allow the Sri Lankan government to mislead the world on this point. Both the Swiss and the South African governments should support a strong resolution at next month's session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva,” said Keenan.

While an Amnesty International report at the end of last year described a “climate of fear”, crackdowns on dissent and continued reports of torture, resultant deaths in custody, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial executions, Amnesty's expert on Sri Lanka, Yolanda Foster, told the Swiss media that carried the story that “[t]he real issue is a continued culture of impunity and on-going violations. This is not just about the past," Foster said.

Chronology:


Related Articles:
07.02.13   Civil Society insists on pre-constitutional recognition of T..
25.01.13   Soul searching in India, Obama wipes out tears
02.11.12   Sri Lanka demands ‘time and space’ to complete genocide
09.10.12   Genocide needs investigation but separation contextually unw..
26.03.12   LLRC centered resolution, an albatross around Tamils neck


External Links:
SwissInfo: Swiss push reconciliation plan for Sri Lanka


ஞாயிறு, 9 டிசம்பர், 2012

South Africa rejects Silva

South Africa rejects Silva for deputy ambassadorship?

[TamilNet, Saturday, 08 December 2012, 17:59 GMT]
Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC), a non-profit group that promotes human rights and rule of law in South Africa, noting that South Africa's President is constitutionally mandated, in terms of section 84(2)(h) of the Constitution, to either receive and recognize foreign diplomats or to decline the sending state’s request, and asserting that "[a]uthoritative and extensive information, including a high-level UN Secretary-General’s report, exists linking General Silva to the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Sri Lankan civil war," concludes "General Silva [as] ineligible for the nominated diplomatic post," and that South Africa is compelled to refuse to receive and recognize him as such." SALC said it has learnt that "South Africa has declined to receive General Silva, although there is no official confirmation of this."

Shavendra Silva, retired Army General
Shavendra Silva, retired Army General
If the rejection is true, SALC said it applauds South Africa's decision.

"It [the rejection of Shavendra Silva] demonstrates principled observance of South Africa’s commitment to ending impunity for international crimes and respect for human rights worldwide. It also shows that South Africa’s foreign policy subscribes to the belief that the maintenance of political and international relationships will not trump human rights considerations," SALC said in the web posting.

"Informed assessment of General Silva‟s suitability compels the conclusion that he is ineligible to take up an ambassadorial position in South Africa on account of the credible allegations against him that he participated in the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sri Lanka in 2009," SALC said.

In a legal briefing paper prepared to assist the President and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) in assessing General Silva’s credentials and in reaching a considered determination, SALC highlights the legal implications of recognizing persons accused of war crimes and discusses the considerations that should inform decisions made in terms of section 84(2)(h), SALC said.

"These are relevant beyond the circumstances of General Silva’s anticipated deployment and it is hoped that the briefing paper will inform future decisions in which the eligibility of diplomatic nominees are assessed, especially in instances where the sending state [Sri Lanka] is one with a questionable human rights record," SALC said in the briefing paper.

The allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes against General Silva require that the President and DIRCO evaluate his eligibility with reference to two key considerations: the purpose and integrity of diplomatic status and its attendant privileges and South Africa‟s domestic and international obligations to ensure accountability for international crimes, the briefing paper said.

"Were General Silva to be received and recognised as deputy ambassador to South Africa, he would be conferred with diplomatic immunity. The practice of diplomatic immunity is intended to safeguard sovereign equality between states and enable the peaceful conduct of foreign relations. It is not intended to shield individuals from accountability for egregious human rights violations. The extension of diplomatic immunity to General Silva would amount to an abuse of the internationally regulated system of diplomatic status," SALC cautioned.

SALC adds, "[m]oreover, by recognising and receiving General Silva, and in consequence recognising his diplomatic immunity, South Africa would render itself complicit in his impunity, frustrating efforts at accountability and denying justice to the victims of Sri Lanka‟s conflict. In so doing, South Africa would violate its own constitutional, domestic and international obligations."

Extensively quoting from Report of the Secretary General`s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka, the legal brief examined the conduct of Sri Lanka Army (SLA) 58th Division operating under Silva's command was "explicitly linked in the UN Report to several of the most notorious violations of humanitarian law and human rights committed during the conflict."

The brief also said, after the war, "Navi Pillay, also expressed her concern to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon over General Silva‟s appointment to this special advisory group, and in a letter stated "that there is, at the very least, the appearance of a case of international crimes to answer by Mr. Silva.""

Chronology:


External Links:
SA: Diplomatic Impunity – Why Suspected War Criminals should not be Diplomats


வெள்ளி, 19 மார்ச், 2010

மகாத்மாவின் சிந்தனைக்கு காரணமாய் இருந்தது தென்னாப்பிரிக்கா



பிரிட்டோரியா, மார்ச் 18: மகாத்மா காந்தியின் சிந்தனைக்கு பிரதான காரணமாக இருந்தவர்கள் தென்னாப்பிரிக்கர்களே என்று காந்தியின் பேரன் ராஜ்மோகன் காந்தி குறிப்பிட்டார்.அமெரிக்காவில் உள்ள இலினாய்ஸ் பல்கலைக் கழகத்தில் ராஜ்மோகன் காந்தி ஆராய்ச்சி பேராசிரியராக உள்ளார். தனது மாணவர்களுடன் தென்னாப்பிரிக்காவில் சுற்றுப் பயணம் மேற்கொண்டுள்ளார். தென்னாப்பிரிக்காவில் கெüடெங் வடக்கு பிராந்தியத்தில் உள்ள தமிழ் சம்மேளனம் ஏற்பாடு செய்திருந்த கூட்டத்தில் பேசுகையில் அவர் மேலும் கூறியது:மத்திய பிரிட்டோரியா மாகாணத்தில் உள்ள பிரின்ஸ்லூ வீதியில் அப்போது இந்திய வர்த்தகர்கள் அதிகமிருந்தனர். இதனாலேயே இப்பகுதியில் தங்கி, இளம் வழக்கறிஞராக காந்தி தனது பணியைத் தொடங்கினார். அப்போதுதான் அறவழியில் போராடும் முறையைக் கையாண்டார். இந்த முறைதான் இந்திய சுதந்திரத்துக்கு வழிவகுத்தது. இதைப் பின்பற்றி தென்னாப்பிரிக்காவும் சுதந்திரமடைந்தது. காந்தியடிகளின் வாழ்க்கையில் பிரிட்டோரியா மாகாணம் மிக முக்கியமானதாகும். அரசியல் களம் புகுவதற்கு முன்பு சில மாதங்கள் இங்குதான் தங்கியிருந்தார். இங்கு தங்கியிருந்த காலத்தில் புத்தகங்கள் படிப்பதும், அதைப்பற்றிய சிந்தனையிலும் அவர் சுற்றி வந்தார். மகாத்மாவின் சிந்தனைக்கு ஊற்றாக அமைந்தது பிரிட்டோரியாதான் என்றார் ராஜ்மோகன் காந்தி.இங்குள்ள ஊர்டெக்கர் நினைவுப் பகுதியை தனது மனைவி உஷா மற்றும் மாணவர்களுடன் ராஜ்மோகன் காந்தி சுற்றிப் பார்த்தார். மனித உரிமைகள் மற்றும் சம உரிமை உள்ளிட்ட அம்சங்களை வலியுறுத்தி செயல்பட்டு வருகிறது ராஜ்மோகன் காந்தியின் தன்னார்வ அமைப்பு.
கருத்துக்கள்

தன் அறவழிப் போராட்டச் சிந்தனைகளுக்குக் காரணம் தென்னாப்பிரிக்கா தமிழர்கள் எனக் காந்தியடிகளே கூறியுள்ளார். நன்றிக்கடனாகவும் திருக்குறளை மூல மொழியான தமிழில் அறியவும் தான் தமிழ் கற்றேன் என்றும கூறியுள்ளார். மறு பிறவி இருந்தால் தமிழ் நாட்டில் பிறக்க விரும்புவதாக அடிகள் கூறியதாகவும் நான் படித்துள்ளேன். ஆனால் அவர் செய்த தவறு அங்குத் தமிழர் பேராயம் என அமைக்காமல் இந்தியப் பேராயம் என அமைத்ததுதான். எனவேதான் இந்தியா இன்று வரை நீங்கள் இந்தியர்கள் இந்தி கற்றுக் கொள்ளுங்கள் என்று தமிழ் கற்கும் வாய்ப்பை மறுத்து வருகிறது.

அன்புடன் இலக்குவனார் திருவள்ளுவன்

By Ilakkuvanar Thiruvalluvan
3/19/2010 3:44:00 AM
உங்கள் கருத்தைப் பதிவு செய்யுங்கள்